Kreo and STACK are both cloud takeoff-and-estimating platforms: STACK is the mature, widely-adopted standard with a deep assembly library and a free entry tier, while Kreo is the newer AI-native tool with stronger takeoff automation, with its AI features on a higher per-user tier.
STACK is the established cloud takeoff-and-estimating platform — a deep, reusable assembly library, a proven takeoff-to-bid workflow, and a free version to start on. Kreo is the newer, AI-native challenger with more automated takeoff; it has a low-cost entry tier, with its AI features on a higher per-user tier. Best mature, deep-library platform with a free on-ramp: STACK. Best AI-native takeoff automation: Kreo.
| Editorial rating | 4.3/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Pricing | From $35/user/month | From $2,599/year |
| Free tier | No | Yes |
| Best for | General contractors managing large project bids where takeoff volume is a bottleneck | General contractors managing multiple concurrent bids who need a shared estimating platform |
| Key strength | AI automates quantity takeoff from 2D PDF drawings and 3D BIM models significantly faster than manual | Cloud-based platform enables real-time collaboration on takeoffs and estimates across teams |
| Review | Detail Review → | Detail Review → |
Facts pulled from our independent Kreo and STACKreviews. Always verify current pricing on each vendor's website.
STACK pairs fast on-screen takeoff with a deep, reusable assembly library and estimating tools built up over years — a complete, battle-tested takeoff-to-bid workflow. Its own AI automation, though, is less advanced than AI-first tools; our review flags that as its main gap. Kreo is AI-native, built around automated 2D takeoff with estimating in a leaner, more modern setup. STACK wins on library depth and maturity; Kreo on being built AI-first.
Edge: Too close to call
STACK offers a free version plus paid plans, an accessible on-ramp for teams that bid regularly. Kreo has a low-cost entry tier, but its AI-powered takeoff sits on a higher per-user tier, so cost scales with team size. STACK's free entry point is the more accessible starting point; Kreo's per-seat AI pricing suits teams that will use the automation heavily.
Edge: STACK
Both are cloud-based and quick to start. STACK is known for getting users running fast, though building advanced assemblies has a learning curve. Kreo's AI-native design aims to cut manual setup. For basic takeoff both are approachable; for deep estimating workflows STACK's maturity shows, at the cost of more to learn.
Edge: Too close to call
STACK fits mid-size GCs and specialty contractors who want a proven, complete takeoff-and-estimating platform with a deep assembly library and a free tier to start on. Kreo fits firms that specifically want AI-native takeoff automation and have enough bid volume to justify its per-seat AI tier.
Edge: Too close to call
Kreo review
Kreo is best suited for contractors, estimators, and construction firms who need to automate quantity takeoff from 2D drawings and BIM models — reducing the manual measurement time that traditionally makes estimating one of the most time-intensive parts of preconstruction.
STACK review
STACK is best suited for contractors, subcontractors, and estimating teams who need a fast, cloud-based takeoff and estimating platform to measure quantities from digital drawings, build cost estimates, and manage bid packages — all in a single shareable workspace.
Best AI Tools for Construction
See our full ranked hub for construction.
Kreo vs Togal.AI comparison
Both automate construction quantity takeoff with AI — Kreo goes wider with 3D BIM and integrated cost databases, while Togal.AI is the more focused, faster 2D PDF takeoff tool.
Togal.AI vs STACK comparison
Togal.AI and STACK both speed up construction takeoff, but Togal.AI is an AI-first measurement specialist while STACK is a broader, mature takeoff-and-estimating platform with a deep assembly library and lighter AI automation.
Independent editorial comparison — not a paid placement.